In this episode, Hemant Varshney, the CEO of Digicom, shares his journey from building a website for his father to becoming a prominent figure in digital marketing. With over 16 years of experience, including roles at American Express and for Jim Cramer at TheStreet.com, Hemant has managed over $100 million in marketing spend, propelling over $500 million in sales. Running a digital marketing agency in 2024 presents unique challenges, especially around attribution with iOS changes and cookie depreciation. Hemant discusses the importance of custom attribution modeling, the shift towards profitability in the startup space, and the concept of product-channel fit. He highlights the significance of data-driven creatives in e-commerce and shares a success story of scaling Babbel's campaign spend dramatically through content campaigns from $25k a month to over $1 Million a month . The conversation also touches on the complexities of balancing creative and quantitative approaches in marketing teams and offers advice on understanding break-even ROAS for better marketing strategies.
00:19 Digging into Digital Marketing with Hemant
01:47 The Evolution of Digital Marketing in 2024
03:33 The Power of Product-Channel Fit
05:05 E-commerce Trends and Data-Driven Creatives in 2024
06:21 A Deep Dive into a Successful Marketing Campaign
10:38 The Art and Science of Marketing Optimization
11:49 Final Thoughts and Advice
00:00 - Digital Marketing Trends in 2024
12:50 - Understanding Break-Even ROAS for Marketing
WEBVTT
00:00:00.059 --> 00:00:01.647
Welcome to today's episode.
00:00:01.647 --> 00:00:03.346
Our guest today is Heyman.
00:00:03.346 --> 00:00:10.548
He is the CEO of Digicom, a digital marketing agency that helps businesses grow through digital marketing.
00:00:10.548 --> 00:00:11.752
Welcome to the show.
00:00:12.800 --> 00:00:13.965
Eric, thanks for having me on.
00:00:13.965 --> 00:00:16.629
Very excited to be on today.
00:00:17.661 --> 00:00:19.126
Appreciate you making the time.
00:00:19.126 --> 00:00:30.853
So, before we jump into your story about some of the best marketing you've done, why don't you just give us a couple of minutes of context about who you are and what you do?
00:00:31.940 --> 00:00:34.563
Sure, so my name is Hemant again.
00:00:34.563 --> 00:00:36.465
I'm the CEO and founder of Digicom.
00:00:36.465 --> 00:00:50.348
I've been in college for my father and running some Google ads through watching YouTube and then from there I guess the rest was history.
00:00:50.348 --> 00:01:09.388
I've worked at American Express running marketing for the Platinum Program, worked on Wall Street for Jim Cramer where I was his head of growth at thestreetcom, then went into consulting and I've worked with a ton of hyper growth startups, very much playing this startup space and the goal is to drive profitable growth.
00:01:11.915 --> 00:01:12.537
That's awesome.
00:01:12.537 --> 00:01:28.875
I'm a fan of Jim Cramer in the street, so that's very cool, and I think you had shared with me that you've managed over $100 million of marketing spend and driven over $500 million in sales for that for your clients.
00:01:28.875 --> 00:01:31.629
Is that about right?
00:01:32.801 --> 00:01:37.772
Yeah, managed a ton of media through a number of different ad platforms.
00:01:37.772 --> 00:01:46.049
Of course you have Meta and you have Google, but also Outbrain, taboola, youtube, yahoo, yeah, all kind of skill set ranges the gamut.
00:01:48.019 --> 00:01:53.112
And here in 2024, what is it like to run a digital marketing agency?
00:01:53.112 --> 00:01:55.864
We live in interesting times and I've seen you've been out there.
00:01:55.864 --> 00:01:59.308
You went to CES, you went to the big Shopify event.
00:01:59.308 --> 00:02:00.686
You're out there hustling.
00:02:00.686 --> 00:02:06.012
What's your impression as we're heading into the second quarter here in 2024?
00:02:06.012 --> 00:02:08.865
What's it like to be running an agency in these times?
00:02:09.686 --> 00:02:15.362
Yeah, I think the big question is what is attribution right?
00:02:15.362 --> 00:02:20.240
All of us here are marketers and we're using different tools and technology.
00:02:20.240 --> 00:02:26.433
And with iOS changes and cookie deprecation, how are we going to continue tracking?
00:02:26.433 --> 00:02:30.306
And so a lot of what we've been doing is a lot of custom modeling.
00:02:30.306 --> 00:02:32.127
We work hand in hand with Triple Whale.
00:02:32.127 --> 00:02:40.667
We take their data, marry it with our client data to understand what a profitability point is for our partners.
00:02:40.667 --> 00:02:52.413
And also there's a giant shift in especially the startup space right, when we went from growth at all costs grow, spend all this money to like, hey, what is profitability?
00:02:52.413 --> 00:02:57.170
How do we build a profitable business and how can we scale that profitable business?
00:02:57.170 --> 00:03:09.912
And those are a couple big shifts, I think, that are occurring in the industry and it's going to happen, I think, at a much more accelerated rate, especially once we hit the summertime and we start seeing cookie deprecation.
00:03:12.260 --> 00:03:17.211
Yeah, I think things are evolving in interesting ways and I agree about attribution.
00:03:17.211 --> 00:03:26.002
Getting fingerprints on the weapon is pretty important, right, knowing what's working, how well it's working, because everything directionally works.
00:03:26.581 --> 00:03:36.210
But which channels work better is really the $100 million question, right and things are happening to does the product or service make sense for this specific channel.
00:03:36.210 --> 00:04:00.128
And my example for that is there's all of these marketers out there with products that they are trying to jam into TikTok and they're spending some time, some energy, and the product might just not just might not make sense for the platform.
00:04:00.128 --> 00:04:08.028
And so we're moving from this product market fit to product channel fit, and this has been occurring over the last three, four years.
00:04:09.379 --> 00:04:10.725
Product channel fit.
00:04:10.725 --> 00:04:11.609
That's interesting.
00:04:11.609 --> 00:04:20.351
I hadn't heard that phrase before, but it makes a lot of sense, because I think TikTok has its strengths, but that doesn't mean that every product makes sense for TikTok, like you're saying.
00:04:20.351 --> 00:04:22.064
That's an interesting way of thinking about it.
00:04:22.687 --> 00:04:34.915
Yeah, exactly, and just like we're always thinking about our audience and maybe their personas, is that audience on that ad platform and, if they are, what is the size of that audience?
00:04:34.915 --> 00:04:42.793
It might be tiny If you have, let's say, we're testing like a anti-age serum on TikTok.
00:04:42.793 --> 00:04:49.254
Yes, there are folks that are 30 plus on there, but a lot of the user base is under 30.
00:04:49.254 --> 00:04:53.230
Just thinking through what we're testing and why we're testing is very important.
00:04:55.240 --> 00:04:59.651
And you do a lot of work with e-commerce websites direct to consumer right.
00:05:00.353 --> 00:05:04.971
Yes, predominantly focusing on the e-commerce D2C space.
00:05:05.920 --> 00:05:14.230
Any trends in 2024 in e-commerce that are noteworthy, that you've gathered from clients and from going to the Shopify event.
00:05:15.581 --> 00:05:17.819
Yeah, I think we've been on the shift already.
00:05:17.819 --> 00:05:24.644
I'm sure you've had other folks on talking about the importance of creative, but I want to take it a step further.
00:05:24.644 --> 00:05:29.086
It's the importance of data-driven creative, and what do I mean by that?
00:05:29.247 --> 00:05:30.307
You're running all these ads.
00:05:30.627 --> 00:05:31.987
How are you tagging the creatives?
00:05:31.987 --> 00:05:36.350
Are you tagging the color of the background?
00:05:36.350 --> 00:05:40.613
Are you tagging that this is UGC or a branded element?
00:05:40.613 --> 00:06:00.636
And how are you pivoting that data to then come back with insights and say this is the subcategories that are working, and here's how I'm going to use this to inform future creatives, versus a lot of brands that I am speaking to are throwing things against the wall and trying to like jam things and hope for a miracle.
00:06:00.636 --> 00:06:12.365
But I think if we just take a step back and go back to the what am I testing and why and what is the like KPI that is most important and how am I pulling this data out.
00:06:12.365 --> 00:06:17.923
It's a lot of work, but once you have that in a rinse and repeat cycle, you can you can drive a ton of growth.
00:06:19.745 --> 00:06:21.166
Yeah, very interesting.
00:06:21.166 --> 00:06:29.456
So why don't you jump in and go ahead and share a story about some of the marketing you've done that you're most proud of?
00:06:30.839 --> 00:06:30.920
Sure.
00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:50.487
So I worked with a few years ago and they started working with fairly not large budgets when I say not large for a company of that size, not large, somewhere between, say, $20,000 to $30,000 of media spend.
00:06:50.487 --> 00:06:52.394
And for this specific campaign style, we ran something called content campaigns.
00:06:52.394 --> 00:07:10.307
So imagine you're taking the affiliate model, which is creating an article about a brand, who they are, what they do, why you need them, and then within that article you have links embedded that you're able to track driving users to your client's website and you can drive conversions.
00:07:10.307 --> 00:07:21.531
We scaled that program and we myself and a colleague of mine, kira we scaled that program from 25K a month to over a million dollars and spend a month in maybe nine months.
00:07:21.531 --> 00:07:24.964
And we didn't just test one content piece, and when.
00:07:25.026 --> 00:07:28.418
A content in this, in this context, is the articles.
00:07:28.478 --> 00:07:30.105
We tested so many different angles.
00:07:30.105 --> 00:08:03.947
Right, I use the, I use Babel myself, so I wrote a lot of articles about my experience, we wrote comparison, we wrote skeptical angles and each of these content pieces worked very different in all of the different parts of the funnel and over time, we of course, hit the CPA targets we needed to for the program and we were able to scale and scale and scale, and that was definitely one of my favorite experiences in terms of like testing and learning, because the testing and learning also didn't just happen on one platform.
00:08:03.947 --> 00:08:04.831
It wasn't just meta.
00:08:04.831 --> 00:08:07.158
We were managing meta.
00:08:07.158 --> 00:08:31.990
We were managing outbrain, there was taboola, there was pinterest, we were managing so many different ad platforms, quora and the goal here was to educate users and drive awareness, but educate users about why Babbel's services and products were so great and then also drive conversion.
00:08:31.990 --> 00:08:43.268
Typically as a growth marketer, we're looking at everything from a performance basis, but we also ran lift studies and recall studies on these content style campaigns.
00:08:43.268 --> 00:08:46.792
That, in turn, helped with awareness as well.
00:08:46.851 --> 00:09:09.730
Yes, we hit the CPA target, but there was also so much more education and awareness happening because of these styles of campaigns a really remarkable ramp up of taking it from 25,000 to investing over a million dollars, and I assume that the ramp up there happened because you were delivering results.
00:09:09.730 --> 00:09:14.982
Something like for every dollar they were putting in, they were getting $5 back, right?
00:09:14.982 --> 00:09:16.845
Is that directionally?
00:09:16.845 --> 00:09:20.134
Is the average you've been able to achieve for your clients, right?
00:09:20.134 --> 00:09:26.118
I assume some campaigns are better and some are a little bit less, but is that directionally what you were able to achieve?
00:09:26.985 --> 00:09:28.008
I would say directionally.
00:09:28.008 --> 00:09:30.153
It's more that we were hitting the CPA targets.
00:09:30.153 --> 00:09:40.772
We were at or below it and because they're a subscription business, they very much have a lot of cohort analysis and they run off of LTVs.
00:09:40.772 --> 00:09:46.029
As long as each channel had a specific CPA target that we were hitting, we were able to scale.
00:09:47.133 --> 00:09:47.714
That's awesome.
00:09:47.714 --> 00:09:48.456
That's great.
00:09:48.456 --> 00:09:49.886
That's what winning looks like, right.
00:09:51.311 --> 00:10:02.453
Yeah, there were a lot of learnings along the way and, just like you mentioned, there are campaigns that are going to win and there are campaigns that aren't going to perform well and for us it's very much breaking down the funnel Average.
00:10:02.453 --> 00:10:14.216
If click-through rates are X and conversion rates are Y and content click-out rates are Z, where are we compared to the media buying price of each part of the funnel?
00:10:14.216 --> 00:10:20.374
And if one part of the funnel is not working, say it's content click-out rate, where do you go from that content piece to the landing page?
00:10:20.374 --> 00:10:21.509
How do we improve that?
00:10:21.509 --> 00:10:25.592
What tests can we enable in that piece of content?
00:10:25.592 --> 00:10:31.153
Because we might also have a secondary KPI where people are spending time reading that specific content.
00:10:31.153 --> 00:10:37.735
A lot of learnings went into it, a lot of testing but ultimately drove a pretty large program.
00:10:38.904 --> 00:10:42.613
Wait, are you saying everything you touch doesn't turn to gold magically?
00:10:43.946 --> 00:10:45.389
It's a lot of hard work, right.
00:10:45.389 --> 00:10:51.486
Hope is you get to target as fast as possible, but sometimes it takes a few months.
00:10:51.486 --> 00:10:54.153
It takes learning, it takes understanding.
00:10:54.153 --> 00:11:04.892
Is AOV high enough to support these CPMs and if it's not, then how do we bundle products together so that we can get AOV high enough for the CPMs and hit a profitability metric?
00:11:04.892 --> 00:11:05.974
It's a lot of math.
00:11:06.095 --> 00:11:08.225
A lot of maths, absolutely so.
00:11:08.225 --> 00:11:12.116
Is that the hardest part about what you do, or are there other things that make it hard?
00:11:12.985 --> 00:11:14.231
I wouldn't say it's the hardest part.
00:11:14.231 --> 00:11:33.495
For me it's definitely the most enjoyable part Looking through trends definitely like a data nerd, and I would say our team we're just, we're a bunch of data nerds and we've been building out a lot more creative capabilities.
00:11:33.495 --> 00:11:39.371
I think the hard part is for the creative folks on our team to think with a quantitative mindset and for the quant folks on the team to think with a creative mindset.
00:11:39.371 --> 00:11:44.725
It's always this push and pull that I've been experiencing over the years.
00:11:46.668 --> 00:11:48.751
Yeah, it's a balancing act, for sure.
00:11:49.693 --> 00:11:51.697
So final thoughts.
00:11:51.697 --> 00:12:00.018
I think the first piece of advice I would give is and I would ask this question do you know your breakeven ROAS?
00:12:00.018 --> 00:12:10.366
And the reason why that is important is there's an unbelievable amount of marketers or founders that don't know that they understand their profit margins.
00:12:10.366 --> 00:12:15.905
Maybe they're great at their P&Ls, but once you put media into it, what is that breakeven point?
00:12:15.905 --> 00:12:21.802
And once you have that number, then you can build all of your plans and it's a lot easier to go to market.
00:12:21.802 --> 00:12:22.909
Or for brands that are launching your North Star, all of your plans and it's a lot easier to go to market.
00:12:22.909 --> 00:12:29.206
Or for brands that are launching your North Star goal of you need to get to the break-even point and then get to profitability.
00:12:30.850 --> 00:12:31.392
Absolutely.
00:12:31.392 --> 00:12:34.359
I think having that North Star is really critical.
00:12:34.359 --> 00:12:39.715
Thank you very much for sharing your story and these insights and advice.
00:12:39.715 --> 00:12:40.957
Appreciate it.
00:12:40.957 --> 00:12:45.511
Encourage everyone to share this episode with your friends so that they can get these ideas.
00:12:45.511 --> 00:12:57.736
I'm going to link to your LinkedIn and your agency's website in the show notes so everyone can easily get there and learn more about what you're doing and connect with you if they want to learn more.
CEO
Top producing senior executive with 14+ years of expertise leading various teams in strategic business planning, digital marketing, product development & innovation to record-breaking revenue and growth targets within large size Fortune 500 companies to hyper-growth startups. Renowned as a high energy & resilient thought leader with strong acumen for a Product and Marketing role at the executive level. Capable of steering organizations through challenging sales, and operations objectives